Linux, as a Windows desktop replacement, gets closer
everyday to what it needs to be. Having said that, it's still
not there.
I installed the latest offering from Red Hat (version 9)
on my PC at work last week (after I first deleted version
7.3. You can, if you want, do an upgrade install but I've
found, over the years, it's best to do a clean install
because doing it seems to reduce the number of problems).
But first, the configuration of the PC is an old Dell
Optiplex GX1 with a Pentium-II 333MHz and 384MB of RAM. I
chose a kitchen-sink install to try to reduce the number of
dependencies later on down the road. Note that you apparently
need to choose the "custom" installation first, and then
later in the install, when you actually choose the packages
to install, you can scroll down to the bottom of the list and
choose "full."
Be aware a full install takes a long time and 4.849GB of
space. For me, it took about an hour-and-a-half to complete.
I realize the PII is hardly a speed demon, but 1.5 hours?
This, in addition to the 15 or 20 minutes to configure the
install and another five or 10 minutes after the install for
more configuration.
Then, having spent all that time, I find that sound does
not work. This is strange because the installer found the
sound card, I went through the configuration, but upon
rebooting, the module fails to install. While sound is not a
high priority in our work environment, this has been a
problem with Linux from as long as I've been installing
various version (several years now). This bug has been
evident for so long one wonders if anyone even cares about
fixing it anymore.
The other perennial problems also still exist. Printing is
still a hit or miss kind of thing. Once again, the installer
correctly probed the HP 2200, but did nothing with the
information. That is, I still had to manually install the
driver by identifying the printer myself. Further, I can't
find anyplace where I can modify the defaults for the driver.
As such, it prints duplex all the time. While this certainly
saves paper, sometimes I just want to print as fast as
possible.
Then there's Internet access. Our network administrators
set up a DHCP server that gives out IP addresses. But that's
all. No DNS, no gateway, no mail, no news, no nothing. From
what I've been told, they did this because they didn't want
just anyone getting access to the Internet. So we
still have people whose PCs are hooked up to the Internet,
but don't know that all they need to do is set the DNS and
they could be surfing.
So, you say, how is that a Linux problem? Well, let's call
it an installer problem. The installer assumes that if you
check DHCP, you don't need to set anything. Which, in our
case, is incorrect. Hence, when you first boot into Linux,
you don't have access until you manually input the addresses
for the DNSs. Perhaps a small and relatively unique problem,
but a problem none the less.
As an aside, after typing in the IP address, I tried to
shutdown to get the change to go into effect, but I got a
segfault as I was doing that. Needless to say, the vaunted
reliability and robustness of Linux takes a hit when you make
one change and the system blows up. But I digress.
And the final major problem - fonts. Yes, they are a lot
better than they were in version 7.3. But they still suck,
when compared to TrueType fonts. I really don't know when
this will be solved, but you really have to wonder why it has
taken so long to be corrected.
Not related to Linux, but Red Hat itself is their update
service. It's so over saturated that it is unusable two out
of three times I tried. I don't know if the situation will
get any better, but if you are paying for access to updates,
but the service is so overloaded that you can't download what
you need, then you have to ask yourself why are you paying
for this?
So, is there anything good about version 9? Sure, it
looks prettier. I've already mentioned the improved
fonts, but the default desktop really is pretty. It's not any
easier to use, and you could make a case for it being
actually harder, but it does look smooth. Otherwise, I
haven't used the applications yet, so I can't comment on
that.
The bottom line is, if you are using version 7.3, it
probably would make sense to upgrade to 9. But if you are at
version 8.0, I'm not so sure this is worth the time and
money. In fact, in my opinion, they should have just called
it version 8.1 and given it away for free. YMMV.