Getting my work done is my bottom line. So I'm not into religious wars. At least, not when they are about technology. When it comes to that, I'm a pragmatist. That is, whatever works best is what I use. Whether "best" is an operating system or browser or music compression algorithm.
While I don't profess to be an engineer or scientist, I like to think I try to choose what I use in a rational way. I especially admire the process of problem solving that educator John Dewey came up with in the early 1900s.
- Operationally define the problem.
- Generate alternative solutions.
- Establish objective criteria to rate the alternatives.
- Decide on a solution that best fits each criterion.
- Implement the solution.
- Evaluate how well the solution met the criteria.
In the end, following a process that is rational is, I think, the most efficient use of my time. Others like to base decisions on values which, in many cases, is a Good Thing. But not always.
For example, the wars between what is called OpenSource and commercial software. Many, but not all, OpenSoftware proponents strongly feel that regardless of how well OpenSource software works, it should be chosen over commercial software because of, among other things, the values of open standards, freedom to choose, and team building embodied in the OpenSource movement.
Proponents of commercial software note that the competitive environment keeps companies focused on building robust products that serve a purpose people are willing to pay money for.
Yes, my characterization of things can be viewed as a simplification of a complex phenomenon. But what's important in this discussion is to understand that each has its niche in the marketplace of ideas and what I like to do is to take what is best from each so that I can get my work done.
Aloha!
