Top of the morning to you! It's Monday. I picked up a
Viking USB 56K modem last week to replace a Motorola 28.8
that was being used on Keiki (the PC SWCNBD uses). I think
I'm going to like USB. A lot. Disconnect the serial cable for
the old modem. Plug in the USB cable for the new. Win98
recognizes that the modem is now connected and asks for the
drivers diskette. Pop the diskette in and press enter and
Bob's your father's brother. The lights on the modem come on
and it's ready to go. Way Cool. BTW, this Viking is the same
company that makes memory chips. Recommended.
As soon as I find a good scanner with a USB interface
I'll by one (anyone out there with any suggestions?). I don't
know if all peripherals will work this well, but so far so
good.
No sooner asked than answered! This in from Richard
Jobity:
Hi. I got on to your page through a link on
http://216.102.91.55/bpages/current.html (BPB Graffiti). Your
site makes for great reading, along with the other tech
journals, such as Dr. Pournelle's.
I haven't yet heard anyone say bad things
about Acer USB scanners. HP, as always, are supposed to be
quite reliable. Lot of complaints about Umax, though.
Just my $0.02.
Thanks to Mr. Jobity for the kind words (and to Brian
for the mention on his site - hopefully he doesn't regret
it!) and information. I've been looking (read that drooling)
at HP . But PCMag.net recently did a
review of scanners and chose the Visioneer OneTouch 760
and the Epson Perfection 636/636/U. I'll have to check out
our local CompUSA and see what they look like. As an aside,
it is an honor to be mentioned in the same sentence as Dr. Pournelle. That
makes my day!
I figured I might get a response from somebody
regarding my misadventures with Linux. And sure 'nuf, this in
from my friend Brian. He
says:
> So the moral of the story my children is
that you can fool some
> of the people all of time, and all of the people some
of the time,
> but Linux, as a replacement for Windows, has no
clothes.
The faithful would have you drawn and
quartered. The pragmatic would say, "OK, then don't use it.
Stick with a system subject to viruses and the BSOD and the
MS upgrade cycle." The strange (including myself) would stand
at the podium at the UN, pounding my shoe on the desk and
shouting odd and incoherent things :).
So you purchased and installed Caldera OL2.2,
huh? Why back a revision level? The version that has a "good"
installation rep is 2.3 (the current rev). I am running RH6.0
(haven't seen a need to upgrade to 6.1), X, KDE, Netscape
4.7, WordPerfect8.0, StarOffice5.1, Apache, Sendmail, etc. On
a 233MHz PII, 128K ram, SoundBlaster, Creative Riva TNT 16M,
tape backup, cdrom, floppy, 5G HD, of which 2.5 G is in use.
It all worked (except for sound) on initial installation.
Certainly Linux is not vying for king of the desktop, yet.
Yet. But things are improving. I am quite happy with Linux as
a desktop environment.
Clearly it is still a YMMV product. But I
have not been fooled, and I am happy. --
regards,
Brian Bilbrey
Hey Brian! Lighten up a bit. All I was saying was
that Linux, or perhaps more to the point, many applications
that run on Linux, put forth as replacements for MS products,
are not ready for prime time (not that Win apps are). I think
Linux apps will eventually get there. And I hope they get
there soon because it's better for everyone when there are
two strong applications butting head-to-head. Or as they say;
"Competition improves the breed."
But as you noted on your own site, applications such
as Netscape lockup on a regular basis under Linux. That's not
to say that applications for Windows such as Opera 3.60
(which is the browser I use the most) don't lock up on a
regular basis because they do. But again, the point is that
applications on Linux do that also. And to the extent that
they do, the question becomes why change to something else
when you have the same problems?
Is Linux better as a network operating system? I
don't know for sure because that's not what I was using it
for. People who know more than I on this point say that it
is. If so, this is great because it gives competition to
Windows NT. But I was looking at it from the standpoint of a
desktop OS.
As far as installing 2.2 rather than 2.3. Well, at
the time I got it, which is a couple of months ago, that's
all there was. I would also note that at the time, it was
hailed as the easiest install of all distributions. And after
seeing a few other distributions I would agree that it is.
Notwithstanding that, KDE, sound support, and kppp did not
work out of the box.
Compare this with Win98, which out of the box, had
all of those things identified, configured, and running
without my having to do anything. Does that make Windows a
huge program? Absolutely. Does that mean that Windows is
therefore prone to bugs? Absolutely. But the chief
alternatives - Linux and MacOS seem to be also.
And while I enjoyed working with Linux as an end in
itself, at the end of the day, I still need to get my work
done. And frankly, I don't care what operating system I am
using to do that (heresy you say!). I just want to get my
work done and get out the door at closing time...
So, the bottom line is, if you can get your work done
better using Linux than you can using Windows, MacOS, BeOS,
etc. then by all means continue to do so! I admire your
pioneer attitude and your willingness to take on new
challenges. As for me, I hate to have to learn a new
operating system only to have similar problems to what I had
before (sigh).
Thanks for your views and thanks for taking the time
to check out my site. Aloha!
And now
Tom weighs in with additional information and views
about Linux (does it seem like I'm being daynotes ganged-up
on? (grin)). First my email to him and then his response:
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Seto
Sent: Monday, November 01, 1999 4:31 PM
To: Tom
Subject: Linux and other Sharp Objects
Hey Tom!
I don't get a chance to check out all of the
daynote pages so I'm sorry I didn't read your comments on my
experiences with Linux until Brian emailed me about it.
First, thanks for taking a look at my site. Someday, maybe I
will attain the status of the august group known as
daynoters. But for now, I just do the best that I can with
the time that I have - shuffle shuffle (since I actually have
a day job that pays the bills - well, mostly. Bills seem to
breed at night faster than I can work...sigh).
And before I start, may I also offer my
deepest condolences to the family and friends of Indy car
driver Greg Moore. I watched with horror the replays of his
shunt. One only hopes that an in-depth finite analysis of the
crash will be done and perhaps, changes in the roll cage or
other areas of the chassis can be made so that this does not
occur again.
With that, I've sharpened my number two
pencil and note the following: Linux 2.3 shipped on 9/13/99.
I will plead guilty that I was and am not using the latest
distribution. But I figured since I've been using 2.2 since
at least June of this year (and perhaps earlier, the mind
goes as one ages) I should report on that rather than
something that just came out. Especially since during the
intervening time, I downloaded and installed almost all of
the approximately 39 bug fixes and security patches on the
Caldera site which gets me at least 90% of the way to 2.3.
But you are right, I did not use 2.3 and it could well fix
all of the problems noted by me. The reason I haven't
"upgraded" (in quotes because there isn't such a thing is
there in Caldera Linux? You upgrade by copying your
configuration files to another location and then delete
everything - or at least that's what Caldera said to do...)
is that 2.4 is rumored to be much better and here Real Soon
Now. And since I didn't want to get locked in to an endless
round of updates, each of which would require more
downloading of fixes, I decided to pass on this one.
PR hype aside? Hmmm. I hope you are right
when you say that the core Linux community views Linux as an
alternative to Windows rather than a replacement. Given the
flames coming my way, I'm not so sure that statement is
accurate, but I will give them the benefit of the doubt
(grin). OK, so if it is an alternative (which obviously it
is), how good of an alternative is it? In my experience, not
very. At least not yet. As I mentioned to Brian, I sincerely
hope that it gets there, and soon. MS, and everyone who uses
their products, needs the benefits that can accrue when there
is true head-to-head competition. But it would have been a
disservice to the tens of readers (you know who you are) of
my site to say that StarOffice or WordPerfect 8 for Linux
were ready for prime time when clearly they are not.
Finally, someone much wiser than I once said
that users don't buy operating systems, they buy
applications. In other words, they buy programs that will
help them do their memos, spreadsheets, or business
presentations. Most people don't give a rodent's derriere
(forgive my French) about what OS is best. Just what helps
them do their job. And that's all I've been trying to do
since the first time I logged into a DEC PDP-11/45 in 1978 to
use RunOff so I could write my terms papers...
Thanks again for the mention on your page and
keep up the good work!
**********
Greetings Dan, and thanks for the
note.
On Greg Moore: I'm not sure the design of
modern racing machines can be advanced much more safety wise
than they already are. Roll cages are custom tailored to the
individual driver, made of titanium, and assembled by the
very best in the industry to incredibly exacting
specifications and an amazing array of tests. On impact, the
cage is designed to separate from the car itself and propel
the driver away from the debris of an accident. A CART race
has a team of some of the most highly trained physicians in
the country seconds away and a helicopter on standby
throughout the duration of a race. None of this, however,
helped Greg one nit. Driving into a concrete barrier at 350
KM/HR is rarely survivable. Why the barrier was not protected
by tires or another shock absorbing device remains to be seen
and answered for.
And yes, I know all about bills too. They
mutate in the night. I hate it when they do that, but rest
assured, Saskatchewan is no different than Hawaii.
Sorry, my friend... I was looking for a topic
of discussion and you just happened to be handy on Sunday
(g).
Linux 2.3 is a vast improvement over 2.2 when
it comes to installation and configuration. So is RH 6.1
compared to 6.0. I wasn't really trying to make excuses for
Linux; merely to point out some of the cautions and caveats
involved when one elects to go experimenting. Whether kernel
2.4 is "better" or not remains to be seen. Expect it before
year's end.
mmm. Core Linux Community. Maybe I overstated
my case. The core Linux community tends to be a bit
overzealous about their passions. Let me rephrase that: Many
of the people I work and communicate with every day who have
deep roots in the MS way of thinking and wait eagerly for the
day when a true replacement for Windows is here and we once
again have a choice. Mmmm. Now I remember why I just said
Core Linux Community. It was simpler.
And you are absolutely correct when you
mention that people use applications, not operating systems.
As a writer I sometime get lost in the underlying structures
and loose sight of land. On the other hand, the stability (or
lack thereof) of an operating system directly impacts my
experience of the applications I'm using. And in the case of
Windows 2000, the line between applications and operating
system is no longer clear and concise. Which is one reason I
have an avid interest in working more with Linux -- the
barrier here is still sharp and focused. Which is one of the
primary reasons why Linux remains the stable platform it
is.
Finally, you are quit right -- WordPerfect
for Linux and StarOffice for Linux are NOT ready for prime
time. Close, I think, but not there yet. But as I said
yesterday, perhaps this is not the best way to use Linux at
this stage of it's evolution... And until both the OS and the
applications it spawns mature, if you're going to play with
Linux, you have to belly up to the bar with a bit of
forethought to what you want to drink. How do you get this
knowledge? Well, you can spend countless days reading and
researching other people's experiences, OR... you can do just
what you did -- open the box and find out for yourself.
You'll find that most members of the daynotes gang use a mix
of both approaches, seasoned to suit individual taste
buds.
I could prattle on and on, but I have this
screaming baby my wife just thrust in my face, and...
/tom
Quick Notes:
I see that Dr.
Pournelle is still working on getting his mailing
list sorted out (pun intended). Here's to hoping it works out
and he writes a good column about it...
The Jennicam
site has some updated photos
of their namesake. Be warned that there is some nudity there
so don't blame me if you get all bent out of shape (as it
were). I can hear the hot headed herds heading her way now...
Other than a couple of charts I need to update, I'm
done working on the proposed legislation for next year so I
guess I'll see what this week brings.
See you tomorrow!