|
|
Monday 8 April, 2002
- Monday Morass
- If it's Monday it must mean the Internet access
is down. And so it is. Oh well, just have to keep
moving on, although this means very few links this
morning.
- Gentoo Aloo
-
I burned the ISO image downloaded from Gentoo over the
weekend. I know many people like Nero Burning ROM,
but I find its interface rather counter intuitive.
I wasted a lot of time and one blank CD-ROM and
never did figure out how to create a bootable CD.
So I used the copy of Roxio
that came with my Plextor
PlexWriter 40 and had a bootable disk in seconds.
But before you start to install Gentoo, you need
to figure out how to use Linux fdisk because Gentoo
leaves it to you to do your own partioning.
However, don't confuse Linux fdisk with Windows
fdisk and do not use the Windows
version to create what you need! While they do
similar things, the commands and how they do things
are completely different. I have to figure out how
to do what I need to do (the installation
instructions for Gentoo are less than helpful)
before going forward. To start, try the min-HowTo
below to get you going but tread carefully,
especially if your are foolish intrepid
enough to dual boot. As always, I take no
responsibility for the quality, or lack thereof, of
the How-To. In fact, you must assume that some
steps were left out or some are just plain wrong
and will cause irreparable permanent damage to your
drive, dandruff, the itch and flaking of psoriasis,
and your dog to get mange. YMMV.
LinuxDoc
LinuxNewbie
- Tanker Update
-
The tanker I talked about last week may have sunk.
The Hawaiian Humane Society mounted a $50,000
effort to find the ghost ship and rescue a dog left
behind when the cruise ship Norwegian Star rescued
the crew last week. Despite their best efforts, the
ship could not be found and it is assumed to have
sunk.
By the way, there is a minor controversy as to
whether it was a good idea to expend so much money
to save one dog when many in the Society's kennels
have to be put down due to lack of funds. While I
will renew my membership, I think I will include a
letter letting them know I am less than pleased
with their lack of judgment in this case.
By the way 2, no one raised any money to recover
the body of the crew member killed in the fire. I
guess dogs have more worth than people.
- Tipping Points
-
One of the insights from creating models of society
and running computer simulations, based on these
models, is the concept of tipping points. That is,
there may be points in the flow of any society in
which applying a minimal amount of force can
produce an effect dramatically greater than would
be expected, much as the last straw breaks the
proverbial camels back. Or to put it another way,
life is sometimes akin to an avalanche where the
initiating event is small relative to the outcome.
But just as it is next to impossible to predict
where a particular snow flake will end up at the
end of the flow, due to our inability to factor in
random, or at least seemingly random, events, so is
it next to impossible to predict, with precision,
the flow of a society in the future. Having said
that, that does not mean we can't learn valuable
information from running the simulations.
For example, if as some believe, genocide begins
with a small core of people, who are then able to
start an avalanche of violence against another
group, it may be helpful to know what pressures are
applied, against whom, and when. Such analysis can
be applied to past events such Rwanda and Nazi
Germany where it appears such situations did in
fact exist. That is, it may have been possible to
stop the killing, in both countries, by identifying
and removing the small core, or protecting those
who were most public in their opposition, before
the core could start their society's spiral into
horror.
If the idea of a tipping point is indeed
efficient in explaining and predicting behavior, it
could be a powerful tool of change (whether for
good or ill is a discussion for another time, but
we need to be aware of the downside and vigilant in
our preventing its misuse).
For more on this subject, see this link
here from the Atlantic Monthly and the
work of, among others, Thomas Schelling, Robert
Axelrod, and Joshua Epstein.
Aloha!
Tuesday - 9 April, 2002
- Resistance is Futile
-
Actually, resistance is a natural part of being
human. People spend a lot of time coming to an
equilibrium that is satisfying for them. Threaten
that hard won comfort zone and you have to expect
resistance. Below is a list of other reasons why
people resist change. The list is intended to give
you a map of the possible pitfalls in any effort to
implement change. It is by no means exhaustive, but
it can act as a guide around the biggest bumps in
the road to change.
-
People resist changes that they were not a
part of the process to implement the change.
Hence, a smart leader will involve all of the
stakeholders from the very beginning.
-
If people are left out of the process, a
perfectly normal reaction is to feel powerless.
If that happens, studies on learned
powerlessness indicate people will stay in
place. That is, they will refuse to move or
act, even if they intellectually understand
they would personally benefit from such a
change.
-
People resist change if they don't know why
something is being done. And they won't know
why if they aren't part of the process. Most
people are not stupid, so if a change comes
down and they were not part of the process, the
natural, and logical, reaction is to feel that
the change will have negative effects on them
personally (which may be why they weren't
included in the first place). Regardless of
whether some, or all, of the negative effects
of a change will be directed at a group, that
group must be included in the planning and
implementation process.
-
If a change is being done solely as a public
relations effort, people will resist the change
because there is typically no benefit to the
employee. That is, a change instituted just for
the way it makes things appear, as opposed to a
valid strategic reason will be resisted. So
don't waste everyone's time with this kind of
change.
-
Related to above, a change will be resisted
if the problem can not be defined in terms that
give a sense of personal self-interest. Or from
the opposite direction, change will be resisted
if it is defined in terms of those out-side of
the organization.
-
Change will be resisted if the fear of
failure, due to a changed environment, becomes
paramount. People like to have mastery of their
environment. They learn to deal with the things
as they are and become masters at operating
within those parameters. Change the parameters
and people become fearful because they will
need to find out what the new rules are, and
then become masters of them. The trick is to
give people the confidence to make the change,
and the time to experiment, that is, to make
mistakes without negative consequences.
-
Even if you do all of the above, people may
resist change because not everyone will benefit
alike. That is, some may gain and some may
lose. If this is the case, no amount of sugar
coating the problem will make it better. The
leader must deal with this head on, with total
honesty, and not try to dodge the problem. The
bottom line is that not all change will benefit
everyone, so don't try to persuade them that it
will.
Having said all of the above, you would think
nothing would ever get done. And to a great extent,
you would be right. But if you have ever seen a
group of motivated people meet a challenge head on,
and create a process that is innovative, while
still holding to such values as fairness, equality,
honesty, openness, and caring for all, then you
know it can happen.
Given the right motivation, people are
incredibly adaptive. If we weren't, we wouldn't
have survived as long as we have.
Aloha!
Wednesday - 10 April, 2002
- Taxing Times
-
When is a tax increase not a tax increase? State
government gets its funds from several sources. The
majority is from sales taxes. But there are other
sources. For example, user fees, taxes on real
property, and grants from the federal government,
to name but a few.
Since the sales tax is a very visible and broad
based tax, increasing that is a dangerous thing for
a politician. So, one strategy is to "raid" what is
known as special funds. Typically, special funds
are setup as separate accounts to hold monies
generated by users for specific purposes, and only
for those purposes.
The largest of these funds is usually the
highway special fund, which gets its income from
gasoline taxes. In Hawai'i, the various taxes on
gas amount to over 50 cents per gallon. The money
is intended for road repair and maintenance. Over
time, hundreds of millions of dollars is generated
by the taxes, and government, being as inefficient
as it is, just can't spend your money as fast as it
comes in. Hence, a balance soon begins to
accumulate. A very large balance.
Locally, the balance hit over $250 million in
fiscal year 1997. With all that money sitting
there, a politician has three options. Leave it
alone; decrease the tax rate so less is
accumulated; or spend some of it for a purpose it
was never intended for. Guess which one is always
taken? Yup.
Doing this can work for a time, especially if
the economy is going well and excess taxes are
coming in. But the time you raid a special funds is
when things aren't going well. This means if you
take too much out of the fund, you can't accomplish
the original intended purpose of the fund. In this
case, fixing the roads. Yes, you can extend the
life cycle of a road by paving it every 13 years
instead of every 10, but have you seen the
condition of a road after only half that many
years? Most surface streets are not designed nor
constructed to last that long.
So you are now in a bind. You've spent the money
in the fund because you don't want to raise the
sales tax. But you now have roads that are falling
apart. What to do? Well, you raise the gas tax, of
course. People won't notice gasoline prices going
up by five or ten cents. Heck, you see that kind of
change almost weekly. So why not? Voters are blind,
if not stupid.
Or are they? I hope they aren't because this
kind of budget smoke and mirrors has been going on
for years and it is high time that we hold our
elected officials accountable for this. So take a
close look at who you vote for this November and
remember that increasing a user fee reaches into
your pocket just like the sales tax does.
Aloha!
Thursday - 11 April, 2002
- Van Cam Jammed
-
After months of uproar over the implementation of a
privately run speed enforcement service, the
Hawai'i legislature voted unanimously to repeal the
law authorizing the program. The Governor, seeing
the writing on the wall, reversed his threat to
veto the measure and says he will let it become law
without his signature.
If anyone wants to do a case study on how not to
implement a program (see my list regarding change
from Tuesday), feel free to come and take a look.
From the arrogant State Senator who first proposed
this, to the arrogant Governor who supported it, to
the arrogant PR person that the State Dept. of
Transportation (DOT) chose to implement it, to the
arrogant head of the DOT who then filled in when
she failed, this a pig dung rich environment ripe
for study.
While studying this steaming heap, think about
how no relationship has been found between this
program and lowering the accident or fatality
rates. Think about how instead of
generating revenue for the state, it will cost us
hundreds of thousands of dollars (and millions more
to get out of the contract with the private company
- no fool them). Think about how the DOT refused to
say how many miles above the speed limit a car had
to traveling before tickets would be issued, even
though a simple computer analysis of the tickets
issued clearly indicated just what that speed was
(six mph over the limit). And finally, think about
a DOT decision to cancel an ad campaign intended to
explain the need for the program to the public
because the DOT didn't care if the people
understood it or not. Just that they vil' obey
(sieg heil!).
- Stopping Light
-
No, I didn't make a mistake. NASA reports (see it
here) on scientists who may be able to capture
light and store it, to be released at will.
Last year, physicists at Harvard University
shined a laser beam into a glass cell filled with
atomic vapors. The light went in, but it didn't
come out again. It was not destroyed or absorbed,
but rather stored -- ready to emerge intact at
the scientists' bidding.
- Moving Images
- One of the last computer peripherals to go
wireless is the thing you use the most - the monitor.
ViewSonic is working on a battery powered LCD screen
that you can pick up and take with you, while still
accessing your applications on your PC (see the story
from MSNBC here). I
don't know if this will become popular or not, but
I'm sure it will find a niche somewhere.
- Law Meme
- Here's a great link from Doc Searls on a
Yale law web site (see it here).
It has, as you would expect, a slight liberal lean to
it but that does not detract from the cutting
commentaries on legal issues relevant to everyone.
Give it a look see when you have a moment.
Aloha!
Aloha Friday - 12 April, 2002
It's Friday!
- Whats the Matter?
-
The more you know, the stranger the world gets.
First, it's scientists stopping light. Now it's
astrophysicists sayings they may have discovered a
new form of matter (see the article from MSNBC
here). Or at least, they may being observing
something that they can not explain, other than by
positing a new form of matter.
At a news conference Wednesday, astronomers
announced that RXJ1856 has a temperature of about
1.2 million degrees, too cool for a neutron star,
and a diameter of about 12 miles, too small to
fit the standard model for neutron stars.
This evidence "points to a star composed not
of neutrons, but of quarks in a form known as
strange quark matter," said Jeremy Drake of the
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the
lead researcher for the RXJ1856 observations.
- Can You See What I Hear?
-
What would it be like to be blind and to see in
sounds rather than images - to even dream in
sounds? Wired has an article (see it
here) on an experiment in which a small video
camera is used to scan the field of vision and then
convert that vision into sounds.
At this week's Toward a Science of Consciousness
Conference in Tucson, Peter Meijer of Philips
Laboratories presented his work on using sound to
help the blind to see. His "Voice" technology
uses a web cam mounted on a subject's head to
scan one's field of view from left to right, and
convert height into pitch and brightness into
loudness.
To the uninitiated, the resulting bleepy
"soundscape" sounds like nothing so much as a
Kraftwerk outtake. Yet these blips and hisses
have given a rudimentary sense of sight to
several blind subjects who have grown to love
their new Voice.
"One day I was sewing and listening to the
television," said Voice user Pat Fletcher. "And I
looked up and realized I could see across the
plane of my bed. The edge was sharply defined,
and beyond the edge rose the box of my
television, and behind that the blinds on my
wall.
- Got That Warm Feeling Inside?
-
The Bush Administration is looking at reviving the
decades old concept of using nuclear tipped
interceptor missiles as a defense against incoming
conventional/biological/nuclear missiles. The idea,
studied by the Pentagon 50 years ago, has the
upside of not requiring you to actually hit the
incoming missile (as most of the so called "Star
Wars" types of interceptors try to do), just be
close enough for the shock wave/heat/radiation to
do its work. The downside is you would have EMF
pulses knocking out your satellites in space and
probably all electronic based devices on the
ground.
Most people do not see that as an acceptable
trade-off. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
apparently disagrees. See the Washington Post
article
here.
Have a Great Weekend Everyone -
Aloha!
© 2002 Daniel K. Seto. All rights
reserved. Disclaimer
|
|
Home
Diary Index
Last Week
Next Week
The Daynotes Gang
Contact Dan
|